Riverside Wrongful Termination Lawyers
- Last Updated:
What "Wrongful Termination" Actually Means Under California Law
California is an at-will employment state under Labor Code § 2922, which means an employer can end your job for almost any reason or no reason at all. The operative word is “almost.” When a firing is driven by discrimination, retaliation for protected activity, or a violation of public policy, it is wrongful and fully actionable under California law, regardless of the at-will rule. Riverside workers have specific, statute-backed protections under FEHA, Labor Code § 1102.5, § 98.6, and § 6310, among others, and those protections come with hard filing deadlines as short as 90 days after certain events. If you were fired and something about the timing or stated reason feels off, what follows will help you identify which law covers your situation and what you must do next.
The At-Will Rule and Why It Does Not Protect Every Firing
Labor Code § 2922 permits at-will termination except when the reason for the firing is illegal. That carve-out is enormous in practice. A supervisor’s performance write-up created two days before a termination that followed immediately after a pregnancy announcement does not become legal simply because California is an at-will state. The at-will rule is the starting point for the analysis, not the end of it. Employers who invoke it as a conversation-stopper are frequently wrong.
Which Riverside Workers Are Covered
Government Code § 12940 (the Fair Employment and Housing Act, or FEHA) applies to employers with five or more employees for most discrimination claims, and to all employers regardless of size for harassment claims. Labor Code § 3351 defines “employee” broadly to include full-time, part-time, temporary, and probationary workers. Independent contractors are generally excluded from these protections, which is itself a contested classification in California. If your employer classified you as an independent contractor but treated you like an employee, that classification may not hold up, and our employment lawyers in Riverside can evaluate whether the label was accurate.
California Laws That Make a Termination Wrongful
Fired Because of Who You Are: FEHA Discrimination (Gov. Code § 12940)
FEHA makes it unlawful for a covered employer to discharge an employee based on any of the following protected characteristics:
- Race, color, national origin, or ancestry
- Religious creed
- Sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation
- Marital status or pregnancy
- Physical disability, mental disability, or medical condition
- Genetic information
- Age (40 or older)
- Reproductive health decisionmaking
- Veteran or military status
If your firing occurred shortly after your employer learned of any of these characteristics, or shortly after a change in your status (a diagnosis, a pregnancy announcement, a request for religious accommodation), the timing itself becomes evidence.
Fired for Speaking Up: FEHA Retaliation (Gov. Code § 12940(h))
Government Code § 12940(h) separately prohibits discharge in retaliation for opposing any FEHA-prohibited practice or for filing a complaint, testifying, or assisting in any FEHA proceeding. You do not have to have won a prior discrimination complaint to have a retaliation claim. You only need to have engaged in protected activity and suffered an adverse employment action afterward. Sexual harassment complaints are a frequent trigger for this type of retaliation; if that matches your situation, our sexual harassment lawyers in Riverside handle exactly these cases.
Fired for Reporting Illegal Conduct: Whistleblower Retaliation (Labor Code § 1102.5)
Labor Code § 1102.5 prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee who discloses information to a government or law enforcement agency, or to a person with authority to investigate, when the employee has reasonable cause to believe the information discloses a violation of a state or federal statute or a local, state, or federal rule or regulation. The statute also protects employees who refuse to participate in activity they reasonably believe would violate the law. Under Labor Code § 1102.5(f)(1), an employer who retaliates faces a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per employee for each violation, awarded directly to the retaliated-against employee, in addition to reinstatement and back wages.
Fired for Complaining About Unpaid Wages (Labor Code § 98.6)
Labor Code § 98.6 protects employees from termination in retaliation for asserting wage-and-hour rights or filing a wage claim. The statute includes a rebuttable presumption of retaliation when a firing occurs within 90 days of the employee’s protected activity, though the employer may present evidence to overcome that presumption. If you were fired shortly after complaining about unpaid overtime or off-the-clock work, the timeline alone may be significant. Our unpaid overtime attorneys in Riverside regularly see terminations follow wage complaints within weeks.
Fired for Reporting a Safety Hazard (Labor Code § 6310)
Labor Code § 6310 prohibits an employer from discharging or retaliating against an employee who makes a complaint about workplace safety or health conditions, or who participates in workplace safety proceedings. Workers in Riverside’s logistics, construction, and warehouse sectors frequently encounter this situation: a complaint about an unsafe machine or inadequate heat precautions is followed days later by a termination dressed up as a performance issue.
Wrongful Termination Lawyers and Claims Based on Public Policy or Employment Contracts
California common law recognizes a separate claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, sometimes called a Tameny claim. These arise when a firing violates a statute, constitutional provision, or established public policy, even if the statute itself does not provide its own private right of action. Wrongful termination lawyers also evaluate whether a written or implied employment contract altered your at-will status. A written employment contract carries a 4-year statute of limitations under Code of Civil Procedure § 337. Public policy (Tameny) claims carry a 2-year limitations period under CCP § 335.1; however implied/oral contract breach claims are governed by CCP § 339 (2 years), not § 335.1. For a broader overview of how these theories work together, see our quick guide to wrongful termination in California.
The Deadlines Riverside Workers Cannot Afford to Miss
Filing with the California Civil Rights Department (FEHA Claims)
The California Civil Rights Department (CRD), formerly the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, is the state agency that enforces FEHA. Before you can file a FEHA-based wrongful termination lawsuit in court, you must first file an administrative complaint with the CRD. You have 3 years from the discriminatory or retaliatory act to do so. After the CRD issues a right-to-sue notice, you have 1 year from the date of that notice to file a civil lawsuit.
Federal Claims: EEOC Deadlines for Riverside Employees
For federal claims under Title VII, the ADA, or the ADEA, an employee in California must file a charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 300 days of the discriminatory act. After receiving the EEOC right-to-sue notice, the employee has 90 days to file a federal lawsuit. Missing the 300-day EEOC window is one of the most common ways meritorious claims are permanently lost.
Common Law and Contract Claims: Longer Windows, Still Limited
Claim Type | Where to File First | Key Deadline | What Starts the Clock
|
|---|---|---|---|
FEHA discrimination or retaliation | CRD (administrative) | 3 years to file with CRD; 1 year to sue after right-to-sue notice | Date of termination or retaliatory act |
Federal discrimination (Title VII, ADA, ADEA) | EEOC (administrative) | 300 days to file with EEOC; 90 days to sue after right-to-sue notice | Date of discriminatory act |
Public policy violation or implied contract breach | Superior Court | 2 years | Date of termination |
Written employment contract breach | Superior Court | 4 years | Date of breach (typically termination) |
What Wrongful Termination Lawyers Look for When Evaluating a Riverside Case
When an attorney evaluates a wrongful termination case, the core question is whether there is a causal link between a protected characteristic or protected activity and the termination. Timing is the most common evidence, but it is rarely sufficient on its own. Attorneys also look for comparative treatment (were similarly situated employees treated differently?), the credibility of the stated reason for termination, whether the employer deviated from its own written policies, and whether any documentation was created suspiciously close to the firing date.
A realistic scenario: A warehouse worker in Riverside complains to her supervisor about unpaid off-the-clock time on a Tuesday. The following Monday, she is handed a termination notice citing “attendance issues” with a writeup dated the previous week. Under Labor Code § 98.6, a firing within 90 days of a wage complaint triggers a rebuttable presumption of retaliation. The employer must now produce credible evidence that the attendance writeup was genuine and unrelated to her complaint. An attorney will immediately seek the personnel file, the supervisor’s communications, and time records covering the weeks before the complaint.
6 Common Defenses Employers Use and the California Law That Counters Each
Employer Defense | What They Argue | How California Law Counters It
|
|---|---|---|
“California is at-will.” | “We can fire anyone for any reason.” | True, except when the reason is illegal. Labor Code § 2922 permits at-will termination only when it does not violate a statute, public policy, or contract. At-will status is the starting point, not the conclusion. |
“We had a legitimate performance reason.” | “We documented poor performance before the firing.” | Pre-textual documentation does not defeat a claim. If the timing, pattern, or content of the documentation is suspicious, courts and the CRD will scrutinize whether the stated reason was the actual reason. Under FEHA, even mixed-motive firings (where discrimination was one factor) can be actionable. |
“The position was eliminated.” | “This was a layoff, not a termination.” | A “position elimination” is a frequent cover for discriminatory or retaliatory discharge. A common employer defense; under FEHA case law, the burden is on the employer to show the elimination was unrelated to the employee’s protected characteristic or activity. If the role was later refilled or the duties redistributed, the “elimination” argument weakens significantly. |
“You never made a formal complaint.” | “You didn’t use our HR process, so there’s no protected activity.” | Government Code § 12940(h) and Labor Code § 1102.5 protect informal complaints, including verbal objections to a supervisor. A formal written complaint is not required to establish protected activity. |
“You were a probationary or temporary employee.” | “You had no expectation of continued employment.” | Labor Code § 3351 extends wrongful termination protections to part-time, temporary, and probationary employees. Probationary status does not waive statutory protections against discrimination or retaliation. |
“You signed an arbitration agreement.” | “You agreed to arbitrate, so you can’t sue us.” | Arbitration agreements in California are subject to procedural and substantive unconscionability challenges and are governed by specific enforceability rules. An arbitration clause does not eliminate your underlying rights; it affects the forum, not the substance of the claim. |
What You Can Recover in a California Wrongful Termination Case
The categories of recovery available in a California wrongful termination case depend on the legal theory and the statute involved. Confirmed recoverable items include:
- Back wages: Compensation for earnings lost from the date of termination through the resolution of your claim
- Reinstatement: Return to your former position, available under FEHA and Labor Code § 1102.5
- Civil penalties: Under Labor Code § 1102.5(f)(1), up to $10,000 per violation, per employee, awarded directly to you in a whistleblower retaliation case
- Emotional distress damages: Available under FEHA for discrimination and retaliation claims
- Attorney fees and costs: Available to prevailing employees under FEHA, which makes litigation accessible even for workers who cannot afford hourly rates
Specific settlement figures and punitive damages caps vary by case and are not cited here, as those figures depend on facts that cannot be evaluated without a case-specific review.
What This Means If You Were Just Fired in Riverside
The most important thing to understand is that your deadlines are already running. If your claim is FEHA-based, you have 3 years to file with the CRD, but the federal EEOC window is 300 days, and waiting depletes your options. Start preserving everything now: save any emails, text messages, performance reviews, offer letters, and communications about your termination to personal storage outside your work accounts, which you will likely lose access to immediately. Write down, in detail, the sequence of events leading to your firing while your memory is fresh, including names, dates, and what was said. Note whether your termination came shortly after you complained, requested leave, disclosed a health condition, or reported a safety issue. A common mistake workers make is assuming that a verbal “at-will” warning from HR closes the matter. In California, it does not. If you are unsure whether your employer’s written warning policy was followed, reviewing that question now costs you nothing. See our guide on whether you can be fired without a written warning for additional context.
Frequently Asked Questions About Wrongful Termination in Riverside
Does California’s at-will law mean I have no case if I was fired without cause?
Not necessarily. Labor Code § 2922 allows termination without cause, but it does not allow termination for an unlawful cause. If the real reason for your firing was discrimination, retaliation, or a violation of public policy, the at-will rule does not shield your employer.
My employer said my position was eliminated. Is that automatically legal?
No. Position elimination is one of the most common defenses employers raise, but it does not defeat a wrongful termination claim on its own. If the elimination coincided with protected activity or a protected characteristic, and particularly if the duties were later redistributed or the role was refilled, the stated reason can be challenged.
I was a temporary employee. Can I still bring a wrongful termination claim?
Yes. Labor Code § 3351 extends employee status and the protections that flow from it to temporary and probationary workers. Your employment classification matters for contract claims, but FEHA and Labor Code retaliation protections generally apply regardless of whether you were called “temporary.”
How long do I have to file a wrongful termination claim in Riverside?
It depends on the legal theory. FEHA claims require a CRD complaint within 3 years, followed by a lawsuit within 1 year of receiving a right-to-sue notice. Federal claims under the EEOC must be filed within 300 days. Common law claims based on public policy or implied contract carry a 2-year period; written contract claims carry 4 years. The shortest deadline you face governs how urgently you need to act.
What if I signed an arbitration agreement with my employer?
An arbitration agreement affects where your claim is resolved, not whether you have one. California law imposes requirements on the enforceability of arbitration clauses, and signing one does not extinguish your substantive rights under FEHA or the Labor Code.
This article is general legal information about California employment law and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Setareh Law Group or any of its attorneys. Every employment situation involves facts that require individual legal analysis. Setareh Law Group makes no guarantee of any particular outcome in any case.
Contact Setareh Law Group's Riverside Wrongful Termination Lawyers
If you were fired in Riverside and believe the reason was unlawful, the attorneys at Setareh Law Group are ready to evaluate your situation. We represent California employees in FEHA discrimination and retaliation claims, whistleblower cases, wage-complaint retaliation, safety-complaint retaliation, and common law wrongful termination claims. Contact us to schedule a consultation and discuss the specific facts of your case before any deadlines pass.
Contact us today:
📞 Phone: 310-888-7771
✉️ Email: help@setarehlaw.com
🌐 Address: 420 N Camden Dr, Beverly Hills CA, 90210
Disclaimer: This information is provided for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Each case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Consult with a qualified California employment attorney to discuss your individual situation.
Sources and Additional Resources
Authoritative sources cited
- Labor Code § 2922
- Government Code § 12940
- Labor Code § 3351
- Labor Code § 1102.5
- Labor Code § 98.6
- Labor Code § 6310
- Code of Civil Procedure § 337
- Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1
- California Civil Rights Department (CRD)
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Related Setareh Law Group resources
Practice Areas:
Table of Contents
- verified by Trustindex
