On-Call Scheduling Laws in California
- Last Updated:
What California's On-Call Scheduling Laws Actually Require
California’s IWC Wage Orders (Section 5 of each Order) require employers to pay non-exempt employees “reporting time pay” any time an employee reports for work but receives less than half their scheduled shift. Under the landmark 2019 ruling in Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc. (2019), “reporting for work” includes calling in by phone, meaning if your employer required you to call in two hours before a shift and told you not to come in, you are likely owed a minimum of two hours of pay at your regular rate, up to four hours. Workers in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Berkeley, Emeryville, and parts of Los Angeles County may also be covered by local ordinances that add further protections on top of this statewide baseline. Federal law (the FLSA) has no equivalent rule, so California employees should rely on state and local protections, not federal standards.
How Reporting Time Pay Works and How Much You Are Owed
The mechanics of reporting time pay are straightforward once you know the trigger and the formula:
- Trigger: You report for work (by any employer-directed method) but are given less than half your usual or scheduled day’s work.
- Amount: Half of your scheduled or usual day’s work, with a floor of two hours and a ceiling of four hours, paid at your regular rate (never below minimum wage).
- Second-reporting rule: If you are called back a second time in the same workday and given fewer than two hours of work, your employer owes you two hours of pay for that second reporting.
- Unpaid standby: If you are on unpaid standby and called to work, reporting time requirements are triggered and you are owed at least two hours of pay.
Worked example: A retail worker is scheduled for an eight-hour shift. She calls in two hours before her shift as directed, and her manager tells her not to come in. Under the IWC Wage Order and Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc. (2019), she has “reported for work.” She is owed half of eight hours: four hours of pay at her regular rate. If her shift had been scheduled for three hours and she was told not to come in, she would be owed half of three hours (1.5 hours), but the two-hour floor kicks in, so her employer owes her two hours of pay.
Does Reporting Time Pay Apply to Your Industry?
Reporting time pay rules appear in Section 5 of each IWC Wage Order, which covers industries from retail and manufacturing to professional and technical services. The protection applies to non-exempt employees only. Employees properly classified as exempt under executive, administrative, or professional exemptions are not covered. If you are unsure which Wage Order governs your industry, the California Department of Industrial Relations maintains the full list at its Wage Order industry page. Note that Ward v. Tilly’s arose specifically under Wage Order No. 7 (Mercantile Industry); workers in other industries should confirm their specific Wage Order applies the same Section 5 language.
The Ward v. Tilly's Decision: When a Phone Call Counts as Reporting for Work
Before 2019, some California employers argued that employees who called in from home and were told not to come in had never truly “reported for work” and therefore owed nothing. The Court of Appeal, Second District, rejected that argument directly.
What happened: Tilly’s, a national retail chain, required employees to call in two hours before the start of a potential on-call shift. If the store did not need them, employees were told to stay home and received zero pay. Plaintiff Skylar Ward brought a class action arguing this practice triggered Wage Order No. 7 reporting time pay.
What the court held: In a 2-1 decision issued February 4, 2019, the court ruled that Tilly’s practice triggered reporting time pay. The court adopted a broad definition: “reporting for work” means “presenting oneself as ordered.” The employer defines the method, and when the employer orders a phone call-in, an employee who complies has reported for work under the Wage Order.
Why it matters: The California Supreme Court denied review, making Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc. (2019) controlling precedent statewide. Any employer who orders workers to call in, log on remotely, or check an app before a shift, and then tells those workers not to come in, owes reporting time pay.
What “Reporting for Work” Means Under California’s On-Call Scheduling Laws
The Ward court explicitly listed examples of how an employee may “report for work”: a phone call from home, a computer log-in, an appearance at a client’s job site, or any other method the employer directs. The common thread is that the employer defined the reporting requirement and the employee complied. For workers navigating California’s on-call scheduling laws, this means the physical location where you “report” is irrelevant. What matters is whether your employer required a specific action and you performed it.
When Your Employer Does NOT Owe Reporting Time Pay
The IWC Wage Orders enumerate four specific exceptions. Each is narrow:
- Paid standby: If you are already being compensated while on standby and are then called to work, no additional reporting time pay is owed because compensation is already running.
- Threats to employees or property: Operations cannot begin or continue due to a threat to employees or property, or civil authorities recommend that work not begin or continue.
- Public utility failure: Power, water, or gas failures that prevent operations.
- Act of God or cause outside the employer’s control: Natural disasters or other unforeseeable events beyond the employer’s control.
Ordinary business slowness, low customer volume, and routine overscheduling do not qualify. Employers frequently attempt to characterize normal scheduling adjustments as operational emergencies. Under the Wage Orders, that argument fails.
Compensable Time for On-Call Employees Beyond Reporting Time Pay
Reporting time pay is not the only protection for on-call workers. Any time you spend actually responding to a call or page, including answering questions, troubleshooting, or performing work via phone or computer, is compensable working time under California law. The only carve-out is de minimis work, defined narrowly as a “minute or two” across the entire workday. That standard applies to the whole day’s incidental activity, not to each individual call. Employers who treat phone-response time as unpaid “idle time” are almost certainly misclassifying compensable work.
If you believe your employer has been systematically underpaying you for on-call time, understanding your rights is a first step. You may also want to review our related guide on on-call scheduling laws in California for additional context on how these rules apply across different industries.
Local Fair Workweek Ordinances: Added Protections by City and County
There is no statewide predictive scheduling or fair workweek law in California. All such protections exist at the local level and layer on top of, not instead of, the statewide IWC Wage Order rules. The table below summarizes each jurisdiction’s coverage and key requirements.
Jurisdiction | Effective Date | Employer Coverage Threshold | Advance Notice Required | On-Call / Schedule Change Premium
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
San Francisco (FRERO) | 2014/2015 | 40+ locations worldwide; 20+ SF employees | 14 days | 2 hrs pay (shifts up to 4 hrs not called in); 4 hrs pay (shifts over 4 hrs not called in); 1-4 hrs predictability pay for late changes |
Emeryville | Ordinance became effective July 1, 2017 (soft launch), with full enforcement/penalties beginning January 1, 2018 | Retail: 56+ employees globally; Fast food: 56+ globally and 20+ in Emeryville | 14 days | Predictability pay tiers: less than 14 days but more than 24 hours’ notice = 1 hour; less than 24 hours’ notice = 4 hours (or shift length) for cancellations, 1 hour for other changes |
Los Angeles (City) | April 1, 2023 | 300+ employees globally (retail) | 14 days | Compensation required for changes or cancellations with less than 14 days notice; records retained 3+ years |
Berkeley | January 12, 2024 | 10+ employees in city; global counts vary by industry (56-100+) | 14 days | 11 hrs rest between shifts; additional hours offered to part-time employees before new hiring |
Los Angeles County | Effective July 1, 2025 | retail with 300+ employees globally; at least 2 hours work in unincorporated areas | 14 days | Compensation for changes/cancellations under 14 days; but rest requirement is at least 10 hours between shifts (not 11), with time-and-a-half if less [source] |
San Jose Opportunity to Work Ordinance | Ongoing | 36+ employees must offer additional hours to existing qualified part-time employees before hiring new. | No 48-hour posted-hours advance-notice requirement found | it is not a predictive-scheduling/advance-notice ordinance; written notice of available hours |
Workers covered by a local ordinance and the statewide IWC Wage Order may be entitled to remedies under both. The local ordinance does not replace the Wage Order; both apply simultaneously. For a deeper look at how these local rules operate in practice, our guide to predictive scheduling laws in California walks through the retail worker perspective in detail.
What to Document If You Think You Are Owed Reporting Time Pay
Evidence Checklist for On-Call Scheduling Claims
- Your written or app-based schedule: Save screenshots or printed copies of every schedule showing on-call or call-in shifts.
- Call records: Preserve phone logs, texts, or app notifications showing the time you called in and the time you were told not to come in.
- Pay stubs and wage statements: Compare each pay period’s wages against the shifts you were scheduled and called in for. Identify any pay period where reporting time pay is absent.
- Employer communications: Save any written policy, handbook language, or manager messages describing the call-in requirement.
- Co-worker patterns: Note whether colleagues experienced the same practice. Class-wide patterns matter in wage and hour litigation.
- Duration of the practice: California’s statute of limitations for wage claims is generally three years under the Labor Code and four years for unfair business practices under Business and Professions Code section 17200. Document how far back the practice extends.
- Your regular rate of pay: Reporting time pay is calculated on your regular rate, not just base hourly pay. Confirm your regular rate includes any nondiscretionary bonuses or other compensation that factor into the calculation.
What This Means for Your Paycheck
If your employer has been requiring call-in shifts without paying you for them, every unpaid call-in is a reportable wage violation, and the clock on recovering those wages is running. Under California’s IWC Wage Orders and Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc. (2019), the law does not require you to have physically walked through a workplace door to be owed pay. Document your call logs and schedules now, before records are lost or overwritten.
If you work in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Berkeley, Emeryville, or an unincorporated area of Los Angeles County, check whether a local fair workweek ordinance applies: your employer may owe both Wage Order reporting time pay and a local schedule-change premium for the same event. Time matters here because wage claims have a three-year lookback period under the Labor Code (four years under Business and Professions Code section 17200), and waiting reduces recoverable back pay. Speaking with an employment attorney about your specific situation is the most reliable way to assess whether you have a viable claim and what remedies may be available.
Frequently Asked Questions
My employer says I was on “voluntary” on-call. Does that change anything?
Under Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc. (2019), what matters is whether the employer directed the reporting method and the employee complied. If your employer required you to be available and to call in, labeling the arrangement “voluntary” does not eliminate the reporting time pay obligation. The court focused on the employer’s control over the employee’s time, not on how the arrangement was characterized.
What if my on-call shift was scheduled for less than two hours?
The IWC Wage Orders state that the two-hour minimum for reporting time pay does not apply to scheduled shifts of less than two hours. For those shifts, you would be owed half the scheduled time rather than a two-hour floor.
I work in San Francisco. Does FRERO replace the IWC Wage Order?
No. San Francisco’s Formula Retail Employee Rights Ordinance and the statewide IWC Wage Order apply simultaneously. If you are placed on an on-call shift and not called in, you may be owed both reporting time pay under the Wage Order and the FRERO on-call premium (2 hours for shifts up to 4 hours; 4 hours for shifts over 4 hours) if your employer qualifies under FRERO’s thresholds.
My employer says the situation was due to slow business. Is that an exception to reporting time pay?
No. The IWC Wage Order exceptions are limited to genuine threats to employees or property, directions from civil authorities, public utility failures, and acts of God. Ordinary business slowness, low customer traffic, and routine overscheduling do not qualify as exceptions under any IWC Wage Order.
Does the FLSA protect me in this situation?
The federal Fair Labor Standards Act has no equivalent to California’s reporting time pay requirement. California law provides significantly stronger protections for on-call employees than federal law. Workers in California should rely on state and applicable local rules, not FLSA standards.
If you believe your employer has violated California’s on-call scheduling laws or owes you unpaid reporting time pay, contact Setareh Law Group for a confidential consultation. Our team focuses on California employment and labor law and can evaluate whether you may have a claim. We also handle unrelated matters, including cases handled by our auto accident lawyers in California, for clients who need representation across different practice areas.
Contact us today:
📞 Phone: 310-888-7771
✉️ Email: help@setarehlaw.com
🌐 Address: 420 N Camden Dr, Beverly Hills CA, 90210
Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Setareh Law Group or any of its attorneys. Employment law is fact-specific and changes over time; the information here may not reflect the most current legal developments or apply to your particular circumstances. Do not act or refrain from acting on the basis of this content without consulting a licensed California employment attorney about your specific situation.
Sources and Additional Resources
Authoritative sources cited
Related Setareh Law Group resources
Practice Areas:
Table of Contents
- verified by Trustindex
