National Origin Discrimination in California
- Last Updated:
What California Law Says About National Origin Discrimination at Work
California law gives workers broader protection against national origin discrimination than federal law does. Under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code § 12940), employers with five or more employees cannot make employment decisions based on where someone is from, their ancestry, their accent, or their immigration status. That protection applies to hiring, firing, pay, promotion, discipline, and every other term of employment. State regulations go further and specifically ban English-only rules, pretextual citizenship requirements, and threats to contact immigration authorities in retaliation for protected activity. Workers have three years to file with the California Civil Rights Department before suing.
What Counts as National Origin Discrimination Under California Law
The California Definition: Country of Origin, Ancestry, Accent, and More
Under 2 Cal. Code Regs. § 11027.1(a), “national origin” covers an individual’s or their ancestors’ actual or perceived country of origin, along with related personal attributes including accent, language use, and immigration status. The perceived-origin rule matters: an employer who treats a worker unfavorably based on a wrong assumption about that worker’s background is still violating the law. Discrimination can also occur even when the person who inflicted it shares the same national origin as the victim.
Who Is Protected and Who Must Follow the Rules
FEHA’s anti-discrimination provisions apply to employers with five or more employees. The anti-harassment provisions under Gov. Code § 12940(j) go further: they apply to every employer regardless of size and extend protection to employees, job applicants, unpaid interns, volunteers, and individuals providing services under a contract. National origin sits alongside race, ancestry, color, religious creed, sex, disability, age, and other protected classes under FEHA. Overlapping claims involving more than one characteristic are common and worth exploring with an attorney.
Specific Conduct California Law Prohibits
English-Only Policies and Language Proficiency Requirements
2 Cal. Code Regs. § 11028 expressly prohibits employers from requiring that a specific language be spoken in the workplace or mandating a particular level of language proficiency. These rules disproportionately burden workers from non-English-speaking countries, which is precisely why California addressed them in its regulations. A blanket “English only” policy at a warehouse, restaurant, or office floor is not a neutral workplace rule. It is facially discriminatory under state law.
Accent Discrimination: When It Is Illegal and the Narrow Exception
Under 2 Cal. Code Regs. § 11028(b), an employer cannot take an adverse action against a worker because of their accent unless the accent “materially interferes” with the ability to perform job duties. This is a high bar. Customer preference for a particular sound, a supervisor’s discomfort, or a vague “communication style” concern does not clear it. The burden is on the employer to prove material interference. A passing comment that a candidate “sounds foreign” in a rejection email, or a supervisor repeatedly mimicking a worker’s pronunciation, is the kind of evidence that supports a claim.
Citizenship Requirements and Immigration Status
California regulations bar employers from using citizenship requirements as a pretextual barrier to employment. If a position does not genuinely require U.S. citizenship, and the employer applies a citizenship requirement only to screen out workers from certain countries, that is national origin discrimination. There is a narrow federal exception: when U.S. citizenship is required by federal law, such as for many federal civil service positions, a refusal to hire a non-citizen does not constitute national origin discrimination under Title VII. That exception is narrow and does not apply to most private-sector jobs.
Threats to Contact Immigration Authorities
One of the most coercive employer tactics covered by California law is threatening to report a worker to immigration authorities after that worker has complained about unpaid wages, unsafe working conditions, or discrimination itself. Under 2 Cal. Code Regs. § 11028, both the threat and the actual contact constitute national origin discrimination when used to retaliate against protected activity. If your employer called ICE or threatened to do so after you raised a workplace concern, that is not a gray area under California law. Workers who have experienced this pattern can also explore their full range of legal rights in the workplace.
Neutral Policies That Have a Discriminatory Effect
A policy does not have to mention national origin to violate FEHA. Under 2 Cal. Code Regs. § 11028(k), facially neutral height and weight requirements that disproportionately impact a national origin group are unlawful unless the employer proves the restrictions are job-related, justified by business necessity, and that no less discriminatory alternative exists. The same disparate-impact framework can apply to other facially neutral screening criteria that, in practice, filter out workers from specific national backgrounds.
California Law vs. Federal Law: Why FEHA Usually Gives You More
Protection | FEHA (California) | Title VII (Federal)
|
|---|---|---|
Employer size threshold | 5+ employees | 15+ employees |
Harassment coverage | Every employer, regardless of size; includes interns, volunteers, contractors | Employers with 15+ employees |
Emotional distress damages | Uncapped | Capped by employer size (specific figures unconfirmed; consult an attorney) |
Regulatory definition of national origin | Expressly includes accent, language use, and immigration status | Covers ethnicity and perceived origin; accent/language addressed in EEOC guidance rather than statute |
Filing deadline | 3 years with the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) | 180 or 300 days with the EEOC (California is a “deferral state”; verify with an attorney) |
Attorney’s fees if you win | Gov. Code § 12965(b) makes FEHA fee awards discretionary (court “in its discretion may award”), though a prevailing plaintiff ordinarily receives them under Christiansburg | Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k)) is likewise discretionary with a strong presumption for prevailing plaintiffs |
Workers at employers with 15 or more employees can pursue FEHA and Title VII simultaneously. A qualified attorney can assess which path provides the stronger recovery given your specific facts. Workers at employers with 5 to 14 employees have FEHA but not Title VII: California law is their primary protection, and in many cases it is the stronger one. To understand how an employment discrimination attorney in Los Angeles can evaluate your FEHA and federal options together, a consultation is the right starting point.
How to Recognize National Origin Discrimination: Signs and Evidence
Direct vs. Indirect National Origin Discrimination
Direct discrimination is often verbal: a hiring manager saying “our clients prefer someone without an accent,” a supervisor referring to a worker by a slur tied to their country of origin, or an email stating the company needs employees who are “culturally American.” Indirect discrimination is harder to see but just as actionable. An employer who gives a worker a low performance rating after that worker complained about slurs, then uses the rating to justify a demotion, is engaged in pretext. The facially neutral reason (performance) maps to a protected characteristic when examined in context.
Warning Signs You May Have a Claim
- A job posting that lists U.S. citizenship as a requirement when no federal law mandates it for that role
- A supervisor who regularly mocks your accent, imitates how you speak, or tells you to “speak American”
- An English-only rule applied on the work floor but not enforced against employees who speak other European languages
- Rejection from a promotion given to a less-qualified applicant of a different national origin
- A disciplinary write-up issued shortly after you complained about discrimination or wage theft
- A manager or HR representative mentioning your immigration status, visa, or work authorization in connection with a disciplinary action or termination
- A “neutral” grooming, height, or weight policy that seems designed to screen out workers from a particular region of the world
- Your employer contacting or threatening to contact immigration authorities after you raised a workplace complaint
- Comments about your food, appearance, religion, or customs that are tied to your national background and that affect your working conditions
- Being excluded from meetings, client contact, or assignments given to colleagues of different national origins without a legitimate business explanation
Illustrative Example: Accent and Promotion
Consider this scenario, offered as an illustration only, not a real client matter. A software engineer born in the Philippines has worked at a 20-person tech firm for four years, consistently meets performance benchmarks, and applies for a team-lead position. The manager tells her the role requires “clear communication with clients” and passes her over in favor of a less-experienced colleague. No formal language test was administered. No specific job duty was identified that her communication could not support. Under 2 Cal. Code Regs. § 11028(b), the employer would need to prove her accent materially interferes with job performance, not simply assert a vague communication preference. “Customer preference” for a different accent is not a defense under FEHA.
A frequent employer defense in these situations is that the decision was based on “soft skills” or “culture fit.” Under FEHA, the burden shifts to the employer once a worker establishes a prima facie case of discrimination. Vague, unquantified justifications that happen to track a protected characteristic are precisely the kind of pretext courts examine.
Deadlines and What You Can Recover
Under FEHA, a worker must file a pre-complaint inquiry or formal complaint with the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) within three years of the discriminatory act. After the CRD issues a Right-to-Sue notice, the worker generally has one year to file a civil lawsuit in California superior court. Missing either deadline can bar your claim entirely. If you are pursuing a federal Title VII claim, the EEOC deadline is shorter; consult an attorney to avoid losing either avenue.
A prevailing plaintiff under FEHA may recover:
- Back pay for lost wages from the date of the discriminatory act
- Front pay where reinstatement is not feasible
- Lost benefits
- Compensatory damages for emotional distress, which are uncapped under FEHA
- Punitive damages where the employer acted with malice, oppression, or fraud
- Mandatory attorney’s fees and litigation costs
Learning about the benefits of hiring a California discrimination lawyer can help you decide whether pursuing a formal claim makes sense given the strength of your evidence and the remedies available.
What This Means If You Have Experienced This at Work
If you recognize any of the patterns described above, your first practical step is documentation: write down dates, what was said or done, who witnessed it, and how it affected your employment. Preserve text messages, emails, and performance reviews. Do not delete anything. California’s three-year filing window with the CRD is longer than most workers expect, but the clock starts on the date of each discriminatory act, and delay makes evidence harder to reconstruct. Workers at employers with as few as five employees have full FEHA protection, so the size of your workplace is not a barrier. If your employer has threatened you with immigration enforcement after you raised a complaint, that specific conduct is prohibited by California regulation and should be reported to an attorney as soon as possible. Harassment claims have no employer-size minimum at all under FEHA, meaning even a one-person shop can be held liable for a hostile work environment.
You can also review what to expect in a discrimination case alongside related protections: for instance, if your employer has passed you over for reasons that involve both national origin and age, understanding age discrimination in hiring and the statute of limitations for age discrimination in California may be relevant to your situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does FEHA protect me if I am undocumented?
Yes. FEHA’s protections apply based on the employment relationship, not immigration status. California regulations explicitly include immigration status within the definition of national origin. An employer cannot lawfully threaten to report you to immigration authorities because you complained about discrimination or unpaid wages.
Can my employer have an English-only rule for safety reasons?
A blanket English-only rule applied at all times and in all areas is generally prohibited under 2 Cal. Code Regs. § 11028. An employer who believes a narrowly tailored language policy is necessary for documented safety reasons would need to demonstrate that necessity and ensure the policy is applied consistently and not pretextually.
What if I was born in the United States but face discrimination because of my ethnicity or how I look?
FEHA and Title VII both protect workers based on perceived national origin or ethnicity, regardless of where they were actually born. If an employer discriminates against you because they assume you are from a particular country or background, that is still national origin discrimination under California law.
I was harassed by a coworker, not my manager. Does that count?
Yes. FEHA’s harassment protections cover conduct by coworkers, supervisors, and third parties such as clients or vendors. The key questions are whether the conduct was severe or pervasive enough to alter your working conditions and whether your employer knew or should have known about it and failed to take corrective action.
My employer is very small. Can I still file a claim?
For discrimination claims, FEHA applies to employers with five or more employees. For harassment claims, there is no minimum employer size. Even workers at very small businesses have protection against a hostile work environment based on national origin.
Contact Setareh Law Group: If you believe you have experienced national origin discrimination at work, the attorneys at Setareh Law Group are available to review your situation. Contact our office to schedule a confidential consultation. We represent California workers in employment discrimination cases and can help you understand your rights and options under FEHA and federal law.
Contact us today:
📞 Phone: 310-888-7771
✉️ Email: help@setarehlaw.com
🌐 Address: 420 N Camden Dr, Beverly Hills CA, 90210
Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Setareh Law Group or any of its attorneys. Every case is different, and the outcome of any legal matter depends on its specific facts and applicable law. Do not rely on this article as a substitute for consulting a licensed California employment attorney about your individual situation.
Sources and Additional Resources
Authoritative sources cited
Related Setareh Law Group resources
Practice Areas:
Table of Contents
- verified by Trustindex
