Ai in Employment Decisions
Can AI Legally Screen Your Job Application in California? Your Rights Under New 2025 Regulations
If you’ve applied to hundreds of jobs and heard nothing back, AI might be screening you out and that could be an illegal discrimination.
California just became the nation’s leader in protecting workers from AI bias. On October 1, 2025, groundbreaking regulations took effect that govern how employers can use artificial intelligence and automated decision systems in hiring, promotions, and employment decisions. Whether you’re job hunting, facing workplace discrimination, or wondering why your applications keep getting rejected, here’s what you need to know about your rights.
What is AI Employment Screening?
AI employment screening refers to the use of automated decision systems (ADS) to evaluate, rank, filter, or reject job applicants without direct human review. Under California’s new regulations, an Automated Decision System is defined as “a computational process that makes a decision or facilitates human decision making regarding an employment benefit”
These systems are everywhere in modern hiring:
- Resume scanners that search for keywords and reject applications before a human ever sees them
- Video interview analyzers that evaluate your facial expressions, tone of voice, and word choice
- Personality tests and games that claim to predict your job performance
- Chatbots that screen candidates based on responses to automated questions
- Predictive algorithms that rank applicants using data from past hires
The problem? Research has repeatedly demonstrated that AI systems can produce discriminatory outputs, often replicating hidden patterns of human discrimination found in their training data.
How AI Discrimination Actually Happens
You might think computers are neutral and unbiased. They’re not.
Real Examples of AI Discrimination:
Amazon’s Resume Scanner (2017) Amazon scrapped its resume-screening algorithm after discovering it disproportionately filtered out female applicants. The AI had been trained on 10 years of resumes, mostly from men, and learned to penalize resumes that included the word “women’s” (as in “women’s chess club captain”).
iTutorGroup Age Discrimination Settlement The company was sued for programming software to automatically reject male applicants over 60 and female applicants over 55, paying $365,000 to settle claims with over 200 rejected applicants.
Workday Lawsuit (Ongoing Major Case) In the landmark case Mobley v. Workday, Inc., a federal court granted preliminary certification of a nationwide class alleging that Workday’s AI-driven applicant filtering algorithm disproportionately disqualified individuals over 40 from employment opportunities. This case could affect millions of job applicants.
Why AI Gets It Wrong
AI discrimination typically happens through:
- Biased Training Data: If an AI learns from past hiring decisions that favored certain demographics, it perpetuates those biases
- Proxy Discrimination: The system uses seemingly neutral factors (like zip codes, school names, or gaps in employment) that correlate with protected characteristics
- Lack of Context: AI can’t understand circumstances like career gaps due to caregiving, disabilities that affect video interview performance, or religious accommodations
What California's New AI Employment Laws Require
California’s regulations apply to employers with five or more employees and cover any computational process that makes or facilitates employment decisions
Employers Must Not Discriminate
The regulations prohibit employers from using automated decision systems or selection criteria that discriminate against applicants or employees based on protected categories under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), including:
- Race and ethnicity
- Gender and gender identity
- Age (40 and over)
- Disability
- Religion
- National origin
- Sexual orientation
- Pregnancy
- Medical conditions
Anti-Bias Testing Required
Employers must conduct testing to ensure their AI systems don’t create disparate impacts on protected groups. The final regulations require anti-bias testing of ADS, impose new recordkeeping requirements, and discuss affirmative defenses to employer liability.
Human Oversight Mandatory
The AI can’t have the final say. There must be meaningful human review of decisions, and employees must be able to challenge AI-driven outcomes.
Third-Party Vendors Can Be Held Liable
Here’s something employers and software companies didn’t see coming: California’s regulations define “agent” to include any person acting on behalf of an employer to exercise traditional employment functions—including through the use of automated decision systems. That means the companies selling AI screening tools can potentially be sued for discrimination, not just the employers using them.
Your Rights as a California Job Applicant or Employee
Right to Know When AI Is Being Used
Right to Opt Out
Right to Request Accommodations
If you have a disability that affects how AI might evaluate you (such as speech patterns, facial expressions, or the need for extra time), you have the right to request reasonable accommodations in the screening process.
Right to Challenge Discriminatory Outcomes
If you believe AI discrimination cost you a job or promotion, you can:
- File a complaint with the California Civil Rights Department
- Pursue a lawsuit for employment discrimination
- Seek damages, back pay, and attorney’s fees
Signs You May Have Been Discriminated Against by AI
Watch for these red flags:
- You’re highly qualified but receive instant rejections from multiple companies using the same applicant tracking system
- You notice a pattern of rejections after video interviews despite strong qualifications
- The job listing disappears or gets reposted immediately after you apply
- You’re told you failed a “compatibility test” or “culture fit assessment” with no specific feedback
- You have a disability, are over 40, or have career gaps and receive automated rejections
- You’re asked disability-related questions in an AI screening before receiving a job offer
What Employers in California Need to Know
If you’re an employer using AI in hiring or employment decisions, here’s what you must do now:
Audit Your AI Systems Immediately
Employers should audit their technology and software systems, identifying any ADS or algorithmic tools used in recruiting, hiring, performance evaluations, or workforce management.
Conduct Anti-Bias Testing
You must be able to prove your AI systems don’t create disparate impact. This means testing across protected characteristics and keeping detailed records.
Review Vendor Contracts
Make sure vendor agreements include robust indemnity provisions, transparency obligations, and compliance assurances. Ask vendors about their anti-bias testing protocols and how their AI was trained.
Train Your Team
Implement Human Oversight
Ensure every AI-driven decision can be reviewed and overridden by a qualified human decision-maker.
Failure to comply can result in:
- Civil Rights Department investigations
- Costly discrimination lawsuits
- Class action liability (potentially affecting thousands of applicants)
- Reputational damage
- Damages and attorney’s fees
Federal vs. California WARN Act: Why State Law Often Wins
As you can see, California law offers significantly broader coverage and potentially greater compensation, which is why most workers choose to pursue claims under state rather than federal law.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an employer use AI to screen resumes?
Do I have to tell employers I want to opt out of AI screening?
Starting in 2027, yes. If you want to exercise your opt-out rights under the privacy regulations. However, employers cannot retaliate against you for requesting human review or accommodations.
How do I know if AI screened my application?
Many companies use applicant tracking systems (ATS) like Workday, Greenhouse, or Taleo. If you applied through an online portal that asked you to answer questions, play games, or record a video, AI was likely involved. Under new transparency requirements, employers will increasingly need to disclose this.
Can I sue if I think AI discrimination prevented me from getting hired?
Yes. California law allows you to bring discrimination claims based on disparate impact, even if the employer didn’t intend to discriminate. You may be entitled to damages, back pay, and attorney’s fees.
What if the AI tool was provided by a third-party vendor?
Both the employer and potentially the vendor can be held liable. The EEOC has taken the position that AI resume-screening tool developers can be considered “employment agencies” or “agents” subject to liability under federal anti-discrimination laws.
Take Action: Protect Your Rights
If you believe you’ve been discriminated against by an AI hiring system, you need to act quickly. Employment discrimination claims have strict deadlines—waiting too long could mean losing your right to seek justice.
Why Choose Our Firm?
- We’re AI Employment Law Pioneers: We’ve been tracking these regulations since they were proposed and understand the complex intersection of technology and civil rights law
- We Know How to Prove AI Discrimination: From requesting training data to deposing software engineers, we have the technical expertise to build your case
- We’ve Recovered Millions: Our track record includes major settlements and verdicts in employment discrimination cases
- Free Consultation: We’ll review your case at no cost and explain your options in plain English
- No Fees Unless We Win: We work on contingency—you don’t pay unless we recover compensation for you
Don’t let an algorithm determine your future.
Additional Resources
Learn more about your California worker rights:
- California Civil Rights Department – Automated Decision Systems (Official regulations and guidance)
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission – AI and Employment (Federal guidance on algorithmic discrimination)
- California Department of Industrial Relations – Workers’ Rights (General employment law information)
Latest developments in AI employment law:
- Read about the Mobley v. Workday case – the landmark AI discrimination lawsuit
- California Privacy Protection Agency – ADMT Regulations (2027 transparency requirements)
This information is provided for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Each case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Consult with a qualified California employment attorney to discuss your individual situation.
Key Takeaways:
- AI employment screening is now heavily regulated in California as of October 1, 2025
- Employers cannot use AI that discriminates based on protected characteristics
- You have the right to know when AI is screening you and to request human review
- Both employers and AI vendors can be held liable for discriminatory outcomes
- Strict deadlines apply to employment discrimination claims, so act quickly.
Practice Areas:
Table of Contents
- verified by Trustindex